TillyGen vs Yamdu

What Yamdu is for

Production management platform with strong scheduling, crew and department workflows, widely used in European TV and film.

Longer-form productions with many departments and a dedicated production office.

Production management systems aim to be the single source of truth for the whole crew. That works as long as every department actually works inside it — and breaks the moment the director and DoP keep a spreadsheet on the side. So the question worth asking first is who opens the system daily and who only receives a PDF out of it.

Where Yamdu is strong

A comparison that only lists your own upsides is not one. This is what speaks for Yamdu:

• Department-level workflows for larger crews
• Strong scheduling for multi-week productions
• Established in European TV and film production

Where the limits are

And these are the points where teams run into limits in practice — not as a flaw, but as a consequence of the design:

• The department structure is overhead on a two-day commercial
• Setup effort assumes a production office that maintains it

Where TillyGen takes a different route

TillyGen is built for the brief-to-shoot-ready path of commercials and branded content rather than long-form department administration.

TillyGen turns a brief into a shoot-ready package: shot list, storyboard, schedule and call sheet that stay connected. Change the creative direction and the affected shots are flagged rather than quietly left behind.

Which tool when

In short: Longer-form productions with many departments and a dedicated production office. If your bottleneck is instead getting from a brief to a plan that holds, that is where TillyGen starts.

The useful question before switching is not which tool does more, but where the process stalls today. Three bottlenecks come up again and again in production teams, and they call for different tools:

• The plan comes together too slowly: days pass between the brief and a shoot-ready shot list, with the client already chasing.
• The paperwork drifts apart: shot list, schedule and call sheet live in three files, and after the second change none of them agrees with the others.
• Distribution eats the time: the plan is done, but every version has to be sent to twenty people by hand and chased up.

What to check before switching

Best evaluated on a full production cycle rather than a single shoot day.

Switching tools mid-production almost always costs more than it saves on that job. The sensible moment is between two projects, with a pilot small enough to run twice if it comes to that. Check first whether the export formats match what post and accounting expect — migrations fail there more often than on features.