F-Stop

The f-stop describes aperture size as the ratio of focal length to the diameter of the entrance pupil.

What this is about

Stops are the currency of exposure talk on set. The standard series — 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16 — steps in factors of the square root of two, so each full stop doubles or halves the light. When a DP asks for half a stop more fill or an ND that costs three stops, everyone from gaffer to DIT converts instantly. The f-number also anchors depth-of-field tables and lens data sheets, which is why it survives on cine sets even though exposure itself is called in T-stops.

A term only helps when everyone on set means the same thing by it — so what follows is how it is used, not a dictionary definition.

What runs differently here

In planning terms, that means:

  • Smaller number, bigger opening: f/2 lets in sixteen times the light of f/8 — the inversion trips up every newcomer.
  • Full stops multiply the f-number by roughly 1.4; thirds of a stop are the fine steps cameras display.
  • Stopping down far past f/11 on Super 35 starts costing sharpness to diffraction.

With TillyGen

In the production plan the working stop sits next to each lighting setup, so power and lamp counts are argued from a number, not a feeling.

Change one constraint and the consequences travel through the whole plan: affected shots are flagged, the call sheet is regenerated, and nobody keeps working from yesterday's version.

Frequently asked

Why does a smaller f-number mean more light?

Because the number is a ratio: focal length divided by pupil diameter. A bigger opening makes the divisor larger, so the resulting number drops.

How long does it take to get started with TillyGen?

A first project takes under an hour to set up. There is no configuration phase in which templates and fields have to be defined before the tool produces anything.

Can the results be exported?

Yes — as PDF for the crew, CSV for downstream systems and through the API for anything automated. The plan stays the source; the exports are views of it.